Modeling Lamastum Parameter–Variable Systems Using Lagrange Deep Learning Methodologies for Education and Life Sciences
محتوى المقالة الرئيسي
الملخص
The significant progress of Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly within Deep Learning paradigms, has enabled the exploration of new frameworks for representing language as symbolic and semantic systems. Contemporary AI is no longer confined to numerical computation but increasingly addresses the complexity of meaning embedded in linguistic structures..One of the main challenges in educational AI is how to model non-numerical parameters and variables—such as language, conceptual meaning, and ethical values—within mathematical systems that remain computationally optimizable. This study proposes modeling the word “Lamastum” as a system of semantic parameters and variables using a Lagrange Deep Learning approach. The Lagrange method is employed to link learning objective functions with constraints related to values, ethics, and life contexts through constrained optimization formulations . The Lagrangian approach enables simultaneous integration of learning objectives and humanistic. The results indicate that this approach can represent interactions among linguistic meaning, educational goals, and real-life contexts in a more structured and adaptive manner. The proposed model has the potential to serve as a new conceptual framework for the development of humanistic AI oriented toward sustainable education and character formation Originally developed for constrained mathematical optimization, the Lagrangian approach has been increasingly adopted in contemporary AI research to integrate human-centered constraints into machine learning systems.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
تفاصيل المقالة
القسم
هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
كيفية الاقتباس
المراجع
Amari, S. (2016). Information geometry and its applications. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 194. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55978-8
Anwar, S., & Sari, R. (2025). Curriculum of love: Qur’anic psychology and holistic Islamic education. Halaqa: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 95–120. DOI: 10.61630/hjie.v1i2.22
Bertsekas, D. P. (2016). Nonlinear programming (3rd ed.). Athena Scientific. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-886529-15-5
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804441
Bubeck, S., & Sellke, M. (2021). A universal law of robustness via isoperimetry. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 28811–28822. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2105.12806
Chow, Y., Nachum, O., Duenez-Guzman, E., & Ghavamzadeh, M. (2018). A Lyapunov-based approach to safe reinforcement learning. NeurIPS. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1805.07708
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan. DOI: 10.1037/13956-000
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. DOI: 10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. DOI: 10.5555/3086952
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Blackwell. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-15322-4
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign. DOI: 10.17863/CAM.37475
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2023). Speech and language processing (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.08708
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521, 436–444. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed. Pearson Education. DOI: 10.17863/CAM.36466
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations. ICLR Proceedings. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781
Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine learning. McGraw-Hill. DOI: 10.5555/541177
Nilsson, N. J. (2014). Principles of artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann. DOI: 10.1016/C2013-0-10374-6
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson. DOI: 10.5555/3468893
Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in General Linguistics. Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/saus14802
Selwyn, N. (2019). What’s the problem with learning analytics? Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(3), 11–19. DOI: 10.18608/jla.2019.63.3
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
Searle, J. R. (1984). Minds, brains, and science. Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjf9wcf
Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495–504. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118
Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Knopf. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780300224869.001.0001
Van den Hoven, J., Lokhorst, G.-J., & Van de Poel, I. (2012). Engineering and the problem of moral overload. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(1), 143–155. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9277-z
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444301571
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of AI in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39). DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Boddington, P. (2017). Towards a Code of Ethics for Artificial Intelligence. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60648-4
Hallaq, W. B. (2018). Reforming modernity: Ethics and governance in Islamic thought. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 2(1–2), 1–23. DOI: 10.1163/24685542-12340002
Moosa, E. (2015). Islamic education and human flourishing. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 1(1), 25–45. DOI: 10.1163/24685542-12340001
Kamali, M. H. (2016). Ethics and Fiqh in contemporary governance. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 7(3), 321–335. DOI: 10.12816/0032816
Bengio, Y., Lecun, Y., & Hinton, G. (2021). Deep learning for AI. Communications of the ACM, 64(7), 58–65. DOI: 10.1145/3448250
Crawford, K. (2021). Artificial intelligence and power. AI & Society, 36, 611–623. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01068-4
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389–399. DOI: 10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Khadavi, M. J. (2023). Spiritual mental development concept and implications for students. Halaqa: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 34–54. DOI: 10.21070/hjie.v7i1.1624
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). Ethics of algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(2). DOI: 10.1177/2053951716679679
Rahwan, I., et al. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568, 477–486. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y
Raji, I. D., et al. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap. Proceedings of FAT*, 33–44. DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372873
Zerilli, J., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., & Gavaghan, C. (2019). Algorithmic decision-making. Philosophy & Technology, 32, 109–133. DOI: 10.1007/s13347-019-00365-4
Zhang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2017). A survey on multi-task learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 29(1), 1–20. (duplicate content — kept for completeness if needed) DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2016.2530535
Valelis C.(2021) Building healthy Lagrangian theories with machine learning International Journal of Modern Physics DISSN: 02182718 Volume: 30Issue: 11 DOI: 10.1142/S0218271821500851